Showing posts with label media coverage of refugee issues. Show all posts
Showing posts with label media coverage of refugee issues. Show all posts

Monday, 9 July 2012

Refugee Problem: Time to Take Action for Regional Relations?

By Ruth Skilbeck

Meanwhile, flying high above those perilous boat journeys of the world’s refugees the Australian Business section reports that: “QATAR Airways has revealed it is talking to Qantas about a strategic partnership it says would allow it to increase its presence in Australia and give Qantas better access to Europe.” (July 5, 2012).

Since the start of modernity the differences in fate of the worlds citizens has been symbolized in their modes of transport, and this is never more obvious than now in the era of globalization when the flights of the fortunate, in the free world, literally soar above those whose lives are at the mercy of the tides and laws of foreign countries they cannot control, the refugees of wars and conflicts and environmental disasters around the world.

Is it really too much to ask of our government that we let in these poor unfortunate people who arrive on our shores through desperate life endangering and terrifying voyages across savage oceans, to let them land and be ‘processed’ here subject to the laws of our land, to become citizens if they pass the tests, and join the workforces, surely this is not beyond the capacity of our fortunate country?

Now that the problem is again under regional discussion, if Australia shows sound guidance and leadership, generosity and wisdom in offering workable solutions, this may well be rewarded in better relations with our neighbors in Asia, who are also grappling with these problems of how to help the world’s most desperate peoples, refugees of war and disaster? Humanity leads to humanity.

Constructing solutions to the refugee problem

IT’s an uncomfortable truth that we in the fortunate free countries of western democracies find it much easier not to think about.  Who are these people who are trying to come here in pathetically leaking primitive boats. They are poor, they have no manners, dirty, uneducated etc. etc. these are the fears of the other. We do not know who are they are. They could be dangerous, could harm us, it’s a way that terrorists could arrive in our country or a potential route for invasion, etc. etc. These are the underlying unconscious fears. Those are not usually articulated directly, yet which underlie the desire to close the door, and shut down the debate, to forget about the problem, block it out.

But years of this ‘strategy’ have failed. The boats keep on coming. And now we are not rescuing them they are sinking and hundred of people are drowning and it is getting worse. The moral obligation, or moral pressure is increasing for Australia to take more positive action in the region.

It seems (from the distance that I am viewing from) that this may be what the Asian countries in our region are pushing for. If Indonesia says it cannot go to the rescue and Australia must. This implies a bigger scale of response is required. There is much talk of a regional solution. And by Indonesia declaring itself hopelessly ill equipped to deal with the emergencies of sinking boatful’s of people and calling on Australia, they are pushing to increase our presence in the region more broadly. Pointing out that Australia has resources that we can use; and must use to deal with the escalating problem of refugees in the region.  The Age reported yesterday: “The head of Basarnas [the Indonesian search and rescue authority], Vice-Marshal Daryatmo, recently said the agency was hopelessly under-equipped for ocean rescue and needed help from Australia.” (The Age, 8 July 2012).

No, from a wider ethical perspective the boatloads of wretched people should not be leaving the shores of Indonesia to attempt the perilous crossing to Australia. But we can’t blame the people smugglers because they do not cause the wider problem; they are part of the wretched cycle of disadvantage that flings the poor filled with hope towards Australia’s shores.

Australia is a powerful country, rich with resources and strong with knowledge and information. We should step in and use this power and knowledge wisely to set up workable solutions in the region, to provide leadership and guidance, set up refugee camps, run them, process the refugees, send them to safe new homes in the region including Australia, can we can do this from Indonesia with cooperation with Indonesia? Maybe there can be several regional centers that Australia manages.

If there are viable alternatives, viable safe ways of resettlement (not waiting for years in camps but actual swift resettlement of refugees in new homes) then they will not attempt to make those desperate voyages by boat.

Surely now is the time for Australia to be working out viable humane solutions in good faith for the future of humanity not only in Australia and the region but globally. This is a global problem and needs humane global social solutions.




Creedy, Steve (2012), ‘Qantas looking to extend its reach with Qatar tie-in.’ The Australian, Sydney, Australia. July 5, 2012.


 O’Brien, Natalie (2012) ‘Australia spurned boat distress call’. The Age, Australia.  July 8, 2012






Sunday, 8 July 2012

Australia’s Regional Responsibility to Rescue Refugee Boats?

By Ruth Skilbeck

Revelations that Australia knew about but did not go to the rescue of a refugee boat, known as the Barokah, that resulted in 200 men, women and children drowning last December, have escalated debate in Australia this weekend over the responsibility and role of Australia going to the rescue of refugee boats in distress on the dangerous passage from Asia to Australia.

Latest debate in the Australian press addresses a key issue of new knowledge revealed by a Freedom of Information search, that allegedly shows that Australian authorities had knowledge of  the whereabouts and plight of  a boat in distress known as the Barokah which sank in December 2011, yet did not act on the pleas of help from Indonesia to immediately send out a search and rescue operation.

The reports of the content of the documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act reveal background to the stories of boats in distress, adding new context to the many media reports prior to this.

An article in today’s Age outlines the events revealed by information obtained about the sinking of the Barokah,  and documents responses of authorities new impetus for discussion over regional responsibilities for maritime rescues.

The Age reports (O’Brien, The Age, 8/7/12) that according to the documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, Australia's maritime authority asserted it was Indonesia’s responsibility to lead the search and rescue mission.


"Australian authorities refused to co-ordinate the search and rescue for the asylum seeker boat known as the Barokah, which sank in December killing about 200 people, despite pleas for help from Indonesia.

Documents obtained under freedom of information reveal that Australia's maritime authority told Indonesia's search and rescue agency that it was up to them to lead the mission."

The wreck  of the Barokah caused massive loss of life,  second to that of the sinking of the SIEV X in 2001 which 358 people drowned.

This revelation follows the last weeks’ dramatic incidents of a boat in distress on its way to Australia on June 19, that was left to drift for days before capsizing with 90 people on board drowning. “The boat broke up in high seas about 40 nautical miles south of Prigi Beach, Java.” (O’Briend 2012). Many survivors were left clinging to pieces of debris for hours.

Whereas media reports state that both the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) and  Basarnas (the Indonesian search and recuse authority) knew about the maritime emergency,  it was apparently left up to local fishermen to rescue passengers from the ill fated boat. 

On the Australian side, the Age reported (amongst other viewpoints):

“A spokeswoman for the maritime authority denied there had been any direction from government about its response to distressed asylum seeker boats, saying its policy was consistent and in accordance with the relevant conventions and international practices.

''The operational circumstances may vary from incident to incident, and it is these operational factors that shape the actual response,'' a spokeswoman said.”

On the Indonesian side, the Age reported:

”The head of Basarnas, Vice-Marshal Daryatmo, recently said the agency was hopelessly under-equipped for ocean rescue and needed help from Australia.”

The Minister for Home Affairs, Mr Jason Clare, referred to this week’s maritime emergency (where 90 lives were lost) as a case of where a call for help was received and ''working with Indonesia, we work as hard as we possibly can to save lives''.

Mr Clare anticipated a reworking of the policy, saying that ''meetings will take place over the next few weeks between AMSA and Basarnas on how they can work more closely together' (O’Brien, The Age,  July 8 2012).

 Looking on the positive side, the 'revelations' of the information obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, following this latest tragedy at sea off the coast of Australia, has the potential for a positive effect of prompting open constructive debate about Australia’s responsibilities under the international maritime acts to rescue boats in distress. 

If there are communications problems that slow response times and lack of regional resources and coordination, the new impetus is to address and fix these. Acted on now, as Mr Clare’s words may prefigure, the revelations have the potential to lead to the ‘regional solution’ that politicians on all sides are calling for, to deal with the refugee crisis in our region beyond party politics in humane and effective ways. This starts as all would wish, with developing a clear understanding of how to fulfill responsibilities under the International Maritime Act in cooperation with our regional neighbours to save lives in danger at sea.



O’Brien, Natalie (2012) Australia spurned boat distress call. The Age, Australia.  July 8, 2012

Flitton, Daniel and Bachelard, Michael (2012) 'Navy vessels rescue boat asylum seekers'. The Age . July 05 , 2012.

http://m.theage.com.au/opinion/political-news/navy-vessels-rescue-boat-asylum-seekers-20120704-21hlm.html