Sunday, 8 July 2012

Australia’s Regional Responsibility to Rescue Refugee Boats?

By Ruth Skilbeck

Revelations that Australia knew about but did not go to the rescue of a refugee boat, known as the Barokah, that resulted in 200 men, women and children drowning last December, have escalated debate in Australia this weekend over the responsibility and role of Australia going to the rescue of refugee boats in distress on the dangerous passage from Asia to Australia.

Latest debate in the Australian press addresses a key issue of new knowledge revealed by a Freedom of Information search, that allegedly shows that Australian authorities had knowledge of  the whereabouts and plight of  a boat in distress known as the Barokah which sank in December 2011, yet did not act on the pleas of help from Indonesia to immediately send out a search and rescue operation.

The reports of the content of the documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act reveal background to the stories of boats in distress, adding new context to the many media reports prior to this.

An article in today’s Age outlines the events revealed by information obtained about the sinking of the Barokah,  and documents responses of authorities new impetus for discussion over regional responsibilities for maritime rescues.

The Age reports (O’Brien, The Age, 8/7/12) that according to the documents obtained under the Freedom of Information Act, Australia's maritime authority asserted it was Indonesia’s responsibility to lead the search and rescue mission.


"Australian authorities refused to co-ordinate the search and rescue for the asylum seeker boat known as the Barokah, which sank in December killing about 200 people, despite pleas for help from Indonesia.

Documents obtained under freedom of information reveal that Australia's maritime authority told Indonesia's search and rescue agency that it was up to them to lead the mission."

The wreck  of the Barokah caused massive loss of life,  second to that of the sinking of the SIEV X in 2001 which 358 people drowned.

This revelation follows the last weeks’ dramatic incidents of a boat in distress on its way to Australia on June 19, that was left to drift for days before capsizing with 90 people on board drowning. “The boat broke up in high seas about 40 nautical miles south of Prigi Beach, Java.” (O’Briend 2012). Many survivors were left clinging to pieces of debris for hours.

Whereas media reports state that both the Australian Maritime Safety Authority (AMSA) and  Basarnas (the Indonesian search and recuse authority) knew about the maritime emergency,  it was apparently left up to local fishermen to rescue passengers from the ill fated boat. 

On the Australian side, the Age reported (amongst other viewpoints):

“A spokeswoman for the maritime authority denied there had been any direction from government about its response to distressed asylum seeker boats, saying its policy was consistent and in accordance with the relevant conventions and international practices.

''The operational circumstances may vary from incident to incident, and it is these operational factors that shape the actual response,'' a spokeswoman said.”

On the Indonesian side, the Age reported:

”The head of Basarnas, Vice-Marshal Daryatmo, recently said the agency was hopelessly under-equipped for ocean rescue and needed help from Australia.”

The Minister for Home Affairs, Mr Jason Clare, referred to this week’s maritime emergency (where 90 lives were lost) as a case of where a call for help was received and ''working with Indonesia, we work as hard as we possibly can to save lives''.

Mr Clare anticipated a reworking of the policy, saying that ''meetings will take place over the next few weeks between AMSA and Basarnas on how they can work more closely together' (O’Brien, The Age,  July 8 2012).

 Looking on the positive side, the 'revelations' of the information obtained through the Freedom of Information Act, following this latest tragedy at sea off the coast of Australia, has the potential for a positive effect of prompting open constructive debate about Australia’s responsibilities under the international maritime acts to rescue boats in distress. 

If there are communications problems that slow response times and lack of regional resources and coordination, the new impetus is to address and fix these. Acted on now, as Mr Clare’s words may prefigure, the revelations have the potential to lead to the ‘regional solution’ that politicians on all sides are calling for, to deal with the refugee crisis in our region beyond party politics in humane and effective ways. This starts as all would wish, with developing a clear understanding of how to fulfill responsibilities under the International Maritime Act in cooperation with our regional neighbours to save lives in danger at sea.



O’Brien, Natalie (2012) Australia spurned boat distress call. The Age, Australia.  July 8, 2012

Flitton, Daniel and Bachelard, Michael (2012) 'Navy vessels rescue boat asylum seekers'. The Age . July 05 , 2012.

http://m.theage.com.au/opinion/political-news/navy-vessels-rescue-boat-asylum-seekers-20120704-21hlm.html


No comments: