Abstract:
To what extent can we be said to be ‘free’
to write? To what extent is self-expression and ‘freedom of expression’ ever
fully possible, if as many theorists from Althusser (2003) to Holquist (1994)
have alluded to, we are condemned to use a language that is social and
patrolled and thereby censored? Does this then constitute an impossible
contradiction for artists, writers and journalists who seek to use language as
freedom of expression and free speech to further the principles of democracy
and humanity, and (self) knowledge? If a writer’s work is censored and they go
into self- exile, to what extent can they then be said to be responsible for
their ‘censorship’? Is this what is implied by the poststructuralist stance
(Holquist 1994)? More pertinently, the
author suggests, is the question of how does the experience beyond censorship, of self-exile, affect
the exiled writer’s writing, in its form, content and effects. These are among
the questions the author explores in this paper, re-positioning her (PhD, 2007)
research into literary self-exiles and fugue writers, Joyce and Celan, in
dialogue with biographical research into contemporary exiled writers including journalists from Africa and South Africa whom the author has interviewed in Australia.
Australasian Association for Literature Conference 2012
HYPERLINK
"http://www.aal.asn.au/conference/2012/index.shtml" http://www.aal.asn.au/conference/2012/index.shtml
Dates:
10-12 July 2012
Venue: University of New South Wales Canberra
No comments:
Post a Comment